Skip to main content

Over 150 LLM Providers · Over 5,300 Models The most extensible AI-powered pentesting platform. Open source. Star on GitHub

MEDIUM Severity CVEs

CVSS 4.0 – 6.9

CVSS 4.0–6.9 — moderate vulnerabilities that may require specific conditions or user interaction to exploit

164,190
Total
101
Known Exploited
Showing 88,803 of 164,190 total · Page 672/1777
6.5
CVE-2025-36506

External control of file name or path issue exists in RICOH Streamline NX V3 PC Client versions 3.5.0 to 3.242.0. If an

5.5
CVE-2025-6012

The Auto Attachments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all version

6.4
CVE-2025-5923

The Game Review Block plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘className’ parameter in

5.6
CVE-2025-22242

Worker process denial of service through file read operation. .A vulnerability exists in the Master's “pub_ret” method w

5.6
CVE-2025-22241

File contents overwrite the VirtKey class is called when “on-demand pillar” data is requested and uses un-validated inpu

6.3
CVE-2025-22240

Arbitrary directory creation or file deletion. In the find_file method of the GitFS class, a path is created using os.pa

4.2
CVE-2025-22238

Directory traversal attack in minion file cache creation. The master's default cache is vulnerable to a directory traver

6.7
CVE-2025-22237

An attacker with access to a minion key can exploit the 'on demand' pillar functionality with a specially crafted git ur

6.4
CVE-2024-38825

The salt.auth.pki module does not properly authenticate callers. The "password" field contains a public certificate whic

5.3
CVE-2025-5815

The Traffic Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability

6.4
CVE-2025-5950

The IndieBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘kind’ parameter in all versio

4.4
CVE-2025-5939

The Telegram for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions

5.3
CVE-2025-5938

The Digital Marketing and Agency Templates Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request

4.3
CVE-2025-5930

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2

4.3
CVE-2025-5928

The WP Sliding Login/Dashboard Panel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up

6.1
CVE-2025-5926

The Link Shield plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0

6.4
CVE-2025-5841

The ACF Onyx Poll plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘class’ parameter in all ver

6.4
CVE-2025-5233

The Color Palette plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘hex’ parameter in all versi

6.4
CVE-2025-5123

The Contact Us Page – Contact People plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘style’ p

6.4
CVE-2025-4586

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmcalendarview' sh

6.4
CVE-2025-4585

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmflat' shortcode

6.4
CVE-2025-4584

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmeventlist' short

6.5
CVE-2025-41234

Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to

6.8
CVE-2025-41233

Description: VMware AVI Load Balancer contains an authenticated blind SQL Injection vulnerability. VMware has evaluated

5.4
CVE-2025-44091

yangyouwang crud v1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the role management function.

4.4
CVE-2025-4418

An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14

5.5
CVE-2025-4417

A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploi

6.5
CVE-2025-36539

AVEVA PI Data Archive products are vulnerable to an uncaught exception that, if exploited, could allow an authenticate

6.5
CVE-2025-2745

A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Web API version 2023 SP1 and prior that, if exploited, could al

6.5
CVE-2025-49579

Citizen is a MediaWiki skin that makes extensions part of the cohesive experience. All system messages in menu headings

6.5
CVE-2025-49578

Citizen is a MediaWiki skin that makes extensions part of the cohesive experience. Various date messages returned by `La

6.5
CVE-2025-49577

Citizen is a MediaWiki skin that makes extensions part of the cohesive experience. Various preferences messages are inse

6.5
CVE-2025-49576

Citizen is a MediaWiki skin that makes extensions part of the cohesive experience. The citizen-search-noresults-title an

6.5
CVE-2025-49575

Citizen is a MediaWiki skin that makes extensions part of the cohesive experience. Multiple system messages are inserted

4.9
CVE-2025-49081

There is an insufficient input validation vulnerability in the warehouse component of Absolute Secure Access prior to se

5.4
CVE-2023-45256

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the EuroInformation MoneticoPaiement module before 1.1.1 for PrestaShop allow

5.4
CVE-2025-29744

pg-promise before 11.5.5 is vulnerable to SQL Injection due to improper handling of negative numbers.

6.5
CVE-2024-44906

uptrace pgdriver v1.2.1 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the appendArg function in /pgdriver/

6.5
CVE-2024-44905

go-pg pg v10.13.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the component /types/append_value.go.

6.5
CVE-2025-49200

The created backup files are unencrypted, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information by downl

6.5
CVE-2025-49197

The application uses a weak password hash function, allowing an attacker to crack the weak password hash to gain access

6.5
CVE-2025-49196

A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive informati

5.3
CVE-2025-49195

The FTP server’s login mechanism does not restrict authentication attempts, allowing an attacker to brute-force user pas

4.2
CVE-2025-49193

The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of t

4.3
CVE-2025-49192

The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an atta

4.8
CVE-2025-49191

Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded

4.3
CVE-2025-49190

The application is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An endpoint can be used to send server internal req

5.3
CVE-2025-49189

The HttpOnlyflag of the session cookie \"@@\" is set to false. Since this flag helps preventing access to cookies via cl

5.3
CVE-2025-49188

The application sends user credentials as URL parameters instead of POST bodies, making it vulnerable to information gat

5.3
CVE-2025-49187

For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to

Frequently Asked Questions

What does MEDIUM severity mean for CVEs?

CVSS 4.0–6.9 — moderate vulnerabilities that may require specific conditions or user interaction to exploit

How many medium severity CVEs exist?

There are 164,190 CVE records rated MEDIUM in our database. Of these, 101 are listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

How should I prioritize medium severity vulnerabilities?

MEDIUM severity vulnerabilities should be addressed as part of regular patching cycles. Prioritize those with high EPSS scores or that affect critical systems. CyberStrike helps you assess real-world exploitability beyond CVSS scores.

Detect MEDIUM Vulnerabilities

CyberStrike scans your infrastructure and detects medium severity vulnerabilities in real time.

Get Started