Skip to main content

Over 150 LLM Providers · Over 5,300 Models The most extensible AI-powered pentesting platform. Open source. Star on GitHub

Mozilla

7,140 known vulnerabilities

444
CRITICAL
788
HIGH
788
MEDIUM
19
LOW

Top Products

firefox 1837 thunderbird 1183 firefox esr 435 firefox mobile 60 firefox focus 20 focus 16 network security services 16 thunderbird esr 14 bleach 5 vpn 4
2,039 CVEs · Page 23/41
8.8
CVE-2022-31739

When downloading files on Windows, the % character was not escaped, which could have lead to a download incorrectly bein

6.5
CVE-2022-31738

When exiting fullscreen mode, an iframe could have confused the browser about the current state of fullscreen, resulting

9.8
CVE-2022-31737

A malicious webpage could have caused an out-of-bounds write in WebGL, leading to memory corruption and a potentially ex

9.8
CVE-2022-31736

A malicious website could have learned the size of a cross-origin resource that supported Range requests. This vulnerabi

8.8
CVE-2022-2505

Mozilla developers and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 102. Some of these bugs s

6.5
CVE-2022-2226

An OpenPGP digital signature includes information about the date when the signature was created. When displaying an emai

8.8
CVE-2022-2200

If an object prototype was corrupted by an attacker, they would have been able to set undesired attributes on a JavaScri

8.8
CVE-2022-29918

Mozilla developers Gabriele Svelto, Randell Jesup and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Fi

9.8
CVE-2022-29917

Mozilla developers Andrew McCreight, Gabriele Svelto, Tom Ritter and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bug

6.5
CVE-2022-29916

Firefox behaved slightly differently for already known resources when loading CSS resources involving CSS variables. Thi

4.3
CVE-2022-29915

The Performance API did not properly hide the fact whether a request cross-origin resource has observed redirects. This

6.5
CVE-2022-29914

When reusing existing popups Firefox would have allowed them to cover the fullscreen notification UI, which could have e

6.5
CVE-2022-29913

The parent process would not properly check whether the Speech Synthesis feature is enabled, when receiving instructions

6.1
CVE-2022-29912

Requests initiated through reader mode did not properly omit cookies with a SameSite attribute. This vulnerability affec

6.1
CVE-2022-29911

An improper implementation of the new iframe sandbox keyword <code>allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation</code> could

6.1
CVE-2022-29910

When closed or sent to the background, Firefox for Android would not properly record and persist HSTS settings.<br>*Note

8.8
CVE-2022-29909

Documents in deeply-nested cross-origin browsing contexts could have obtained permissions granted to the top-level origi

8.8
CVE-2022-28289

Mozilla developers and community members Nika Layzell, Andrew McCreight, Gabriele Svelto, and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team r

8.8
CVE-2022-28288

Mozilla developers and community members Randell Jesup, Sebastian Hengst, and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory s

6.5
CVE-2022-28287

In unusual circumstances, selecting text could cause text selection caching to behave incorrectly, leading to a crash. T

5.4
CVE-2022-28286

Due to a layout change, iframe contents could have been rendered outside of its border. This could have led to user conf

6.5
CVE-2022-28285

When generating the assembly code for <code>MLoadTypedArrayElementHole</code>, an incorrect AliasSet was used. In conjun

8.8
CVE-2022-28284

SVG's <code>&lt;use&gt;</code> element could have been used to load unexpected content that could have executed script i

6.5
CVE-2022-28283

The sourceMapURL feature in devtools was missing security checks that would have allowed a webpage to attempt to include

6.5
CVE-2022-28282

By using a link with <code>rel="localization"</code> a use-after-free could have been triggered by destroying an object

8.8
CVE-2022-28281

If a compromised content process sent an unexpected number of WebAuthN Extensions in a Register command to the parent pr

9.6
CVE-2022-26486 KEV

An unexpected message in the WebGPU IPC framework could lead to a use-after-free and exploitable sandbox escape. We have

8.8
CVE-2022-26485 KEV

Removing an XSLT parameter during processing could have lead to an exploitable use-after-free. We have had reports of at

7.5
CVE-2022-26387

When installing an add-on, Firefox verified the signature before prompting the user; but while the user was confirming t

6.5
CVE-2022-26386

Previously Firefox for macOS and Linux would download temporary files to a user-specific directory in <code>/tmp</code>,

6.5
CVE-2022-26385

In unusual circumstances, an individual thread may outlive the thread's manager during shutdown. This could have led to

9.6
CVE-2022-26384

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scri

4.3
CVE-2022-26383

When resizing a popup after requesting fullscreen access, the popup would not display the fullscreen notification. This

4.3
CVE-2022-26382

While the text displayed in Autofill tooltips cannot be directly read by JavaScript, the text was rendered using page fo

8.8
CVE-2022-26381

An attacker could have caused a use-after-free by forcing a text reflow in an SVG object leading to a potentially exploi

8.8
CVE-2022-22764

Mozilla developers Paul Adenot and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 96 and Firefo

8.8
CVE-2022-22763

When a worker is shutdown, it was possible to cause script to run late in the lifecycle, at a point after where it shoul

4.3
CVE-2022-22762

Under certain circumstances, a JavaScript alert (or prompt) could have been shown while another website was displayed un

8.8
CVE-2022-22761

Web-accessible extension pages (pages with a moz-extension:// scheme) were not correctly enforcing the frame-ancestors d

6.5
CVE-2022-22760

When importing resources using Web Workers, error messages would distinguish the difference between <code>application/ja

9.6
CVE-2022-22759

If a document created a sandboxed iframe without <code>allow-scripts</code>, and subsequently appended an element to the

8.8
CVE-2022-22758

When clicking on a tel: link, USSD codes, specified after a <code>\*</code> character, would be included in the phone nu

6.5
CVE-2022-22757

Remote Agent, used in WebDriver, did not validate the Host or Origin headers. This could have allowed websites to connec

8.8
CVE-2022-22756

If a user was convinced to drag and drop an image to their desktop or other folder, the resulting object could have been

8.8
CVE-2022-22755

By using XSL Transforms, a malicious webserver could have served a user an XSL document that would continue to execute J

6.5
CVE-2022-22754

If a user installed an extension of a particular type, the extension could have auto-updated itself and while doing so,

7.1
CVE-2022-22753

A Time-of-Check Time-of-Use bug existed in the Maintenance (Updater) Service that could be abused to grant Users write a

8.8
CVE-2022-22752

Mozilla developers Christian Holler and Jason Kratzer reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 95. Some of these b

8.8
CVE-2022-22751

Mozilla developers Calixte Denizet, Kershaw Chang, Christian Holler, Jason Kratzer, Gabriele Svelto, Tyson Smith, Simon

6.5
CVE-2022-22750

By generally accepting and passing resource handles across processes, a compromised content process might have confused

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CVEs affect Mozilla?

Mozilla has 7,140 CVE records in our database, including 872 critical and 3343 high severity vulnerabilities. 11 of these are listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

What are the most severe Mozilla vulnerabilities?

Mozilla has 872 critical severity (CVSS 9.0+) and 3343 high severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9) vulnerabilities. 11 vulnerabilities are confirmed as actively exploited in the wild.

How can I scan for Mozilla vulnerabilities?

CyberStrike's AI-powered security agents automatically detect vulnerabilities in Mozilla products across your infrastructure. The platform provides continuous pentesting, DAST scanning, and real-time vulnerability monitoring with actionable remediation guidance.

Detect Mozilla Vulnerabilities

CyberStrike scans your infrastructure for Mozilla vulnerabilities and provides real-time remediation guidance.

Get Started