Libexpat Project
20 known vulnerabilities
Top Products
libexpat before 2.8.2 does not consider XML_TOK_DATA_CHARS in doCdataSection and thus lacks handler call depth tracking
xmlwf in libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in endDoctypeDecl via NOTATION declarations.
xmlwf in libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in resolveSystemId.
xmlwf in libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow for the output filename when -d outputDir is used.
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in copyString.
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in doProlog that is related to storeEntityValue and entity textLen.
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in XML_ParseBuffer because it lacked a check that was present in XML_Parse
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in getAttributeId.
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in addBinding.
libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in storeAtts.
In libexpat before 2.8.2, there is a heap-based buffer overflow in doProlog in xmlparse.c because scaffold backing array
libexpat before 2.8.2 lacks handler call depth tracking for calls to XML_ResumeParser from within handlers in cases of a
libexpat before 2.8.2 lacks handler call depth tracking for calls to XML_GetBuffer, XML_Parse, XML_ParseBuffer, XML_Pars
In libexpat before 2.8.1, the computational complexity of attribute name collision checks allows a denial of service via
libexpat before 2.8.0 uses insufficient entropy, and thus hash flooding can occur via a crafted XML document.
libexpat before 2.7.5 allows a NULL pointer dereference in the function setContext on retry after an earlier ouf-of-memo
libexpat before 2.7.5 allows an infinite loop while parsing DTD content.
libexpat before 2.7.5 allows a NULL pointer dereference with empty external parameter entity content.
In libexpat before 2.7.4, the doContent function does not properly determine the buffer size bufSize because there is no
In libexpat before 2.7.4, XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate does not copy unknown encoding handler user data.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CVEs affect Libexpat Project?
Libexpat Project has 20 CVE records in our database, including 0 critical and 0 high severity vulnerabilities.
What are the most severe Libexpat Project vulnerabilities?
Libexpat Project has 0 critical severity (CVSS 9.0+) and 0 high severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9) vulnerabilities. Review the list above sorted by publication date to find the most recent high-severity issues.
How can I scan for Libexpat Project vulnerabilities?
CyberStrike's AI-powered security agents automatically detect vulnerabilities in Libexpat Project products across your infrastructure. The platform provides continuous pentesting, DAST scanning, and real-time vulnerability monitoring with actionable remediation guidance.
Detect Libexpat Project Vulnerabilities
CyberStrike scans your infrastructure for Libexpat Project vulnerabilities and provides real-time remediation guidance.
Get Started