CVE-2015-10093
2.6 · LOWA vulnerability was found in Mark User as Spammer Plugin 1.0.0/1.0.1 on WordPress.
Overview
CVE-2015-10093 is a low-severity vulnerability. It was published on March 6, 2023 and has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 2.6 (LOW).
This vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 2.6, rated LOW. It can be exploited remotely over the network. Some level of privileges is required for exploitation.
Technical description
A vulnerability was found in Mark User as Spammer Plugin 1.0.0/1.0.1 on WordPress. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function user_row_actions of the file plugin/plugin.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. Upgrading to version 1.0.2 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is e7059727274d2767c240c55c02c163eaa4ba6c62. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-222325 was assigned to this vulnerability.
Remediation
Check the references section for vendor advisories, patches, and mitigation guidance. If immediate patching is not possible, review the CVSS vector to understand the attack surface and apply compensating controls such as network segmentation or access restrictions.
References
How CyberStrike helps
Reason, not just scan
It reasons through your app's logic the way a human pentester would, so it finds flaws signature scanners miss.
Learn moreVerified findings
Every finding is proven exploitable before you see it, which cuts the false positives that bury real risk.
Learn moreAI-driven DAST and SAST
Probe running apps and read source from one engine, so issues are caught before and after they ship.
Learn moreOpen source
Read exactly how it tests and what it reports. CyberStrike is open source and in early access.
View the repo
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2015-10093?
CVE-2015-10093 is a low-severity vulnerability. It was published on March 6, 2023 and has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 2.6 (LOW).
How severe is CVE-2015-10093?
This vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 2.6, rated LOW. It can be exploited remotely over the network. Some level of privileges is required for exploitation.
How do I fix or remediate CVE-2015-10093?
Check the references section for vendor advisories, patches, and mitigation guidance. If immediate patching is not possible, review the CVSS vector to understand the attack surface and apply compensating controls such as network segmentation or access restrictions.
How can CyberStrike help with CVE-2015-10093?
CyberStrike is an open-source, AI-augmented pentesting engine. Rather than flag a version number, it tests whether an issue like CVE-2015-10093 is actually reachable in your own applications and APIs, then verifies each finding before reporting it. That tells you if the weakness is a real, exploitable risk in your environment or a false positive you can safely deprioritize.
Related LOW CVEs from 2015
View all- 3.8CVE-2015-2651
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Sun Solaris 11.2 allows local users to affect availability via v
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-2808
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state dat
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-0121
IBM Rational Requirements Composer 3.0 through 3.0.1.6 and 4.0 through 4.0.7 and Rational DOORS Next
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-1841
The Web Admin interface in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) allows local users to
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-4834
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Sun Solaris 11.2 allows local users to affect confidentiality, i
View details - 3.7CVE-2013-5229
The Remote Desktop full-screen feature in Apple OS X before 10.9 and Apple Remote Desktop before 3.7
View details - 3.7CVE-2015-8253
The Frontel protocol before 3 on RSI Video Technologies Videofied devices sets up AES encryption but
View details - 3.7CVE-2014-4876
Toshiba 4690 Operating System 6 Release 3, when the ADXSITCF logical name is not properly restricted
View details - 3.6CVE-2014-0005
PicketBox and JBossSX, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.2.2 and JB
View details - 3.6CVE-2014-9683
Off-by-one error in the ecryptfs_decode_from_filename function in fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c in the eCrypt
View details - 3.6CVE-2015-3631
Docker Engine before 1.6.1 allows local users to set arbitrary Linux Security Modules (LSM) and dock
View details